Rajah & Tann Regional Round-Up
your snapshot of key legal developments in Asia
Issue 3 - Jul/Aug/Sep 2020
 

Restorative Justice Gaining Support in AGO's New Regulation

A new regulation enacted by the Attorney General Office ("AGO") allows the discontinuation of prosecution based on restorative justice. While the concept of restorative justice is not new, it used to be the case that restorative justice only applies at the investigation stage. This regulation broadens its scope and in effect allows a perpetrator to avoid a criminal conviction.


Under the regulation, the dismissal of a prosecution based on restorative justice must meet certain conditions. These conditions include the requirement that the suspect is a first-time offender and the offence is punishable by a fine or imprisonment of fewer than five years. The suspect and the victim must also sign a settlement agreement. 


Restorative justice can only be invoked by AGO. Neither the suspect nor the victim can apply for restorative justice. In addition, the scope of restorative justice is relatively narrow. It does not apply to particular offences, including those against state security, public order and insults, drug offences, and environmental crimes.


Notification Procedure Simplified, and Asset Notifications Clarified

Following the issuance of the new merger regulation, the Indonesia Competition Commission or Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha ("KPPU") held a public webinar to clarify various questions on asset acquisition notifications.


First, KPPU made it clear that certain asset acquisitions will not trigger the mandatory notification post-acquisition. These include assets acquisitions that (i) are below the threshold value; (ii) do not form part of the acquiring company's ordinary course of business; (iii) acquire assets for a specific use; and (iv) acquire assets that do not relate to the acquiring company's business activities.


Second, KPPU simplified the notification procedure for eligible transactions, which are those with no or minimum anti-competitive concerns.


KPPU stated that both topics would be included in the implementing guidelines for the merger regulation, which is currently being finalised by KPPU.


OJK Continues Tightening its Grip on Public Companies: New Rule on Affiliated Party and Conflict of Interest Transaction

Public companies entering an affiliated party transaction must now obtain approval from their independent shareholders. In addition, they must have an adequate procedure in place to compare the terms and conditions of the affiliated party transaction against an ordinary transaction, to ensure that the former is carried out based on generally accepted business principles and an arm's length basis.


The independent shareholders' approval requirement applies if (i) the value of the transaction is above the company's material transaction threshold; (ii) the transaction may affect the company's business activities; or (iii) it is ordered by Indonesia's Financial Services Authority or Otoritas Jasa Keuangan ("OJK"). Some transactions are exempted, including entering into a direct facility agreement with a bank or similar entity.


On conflict of interest transactions, OJK broadens its definition to mean any transaction between a public company or a controlled company with any party, either affiliated or non-affiliated, that contains a conflict of interest.




Please note that whilst the information in this Update is correct to the best of our knowledge and belief at the time of writing, it is only intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be treated as a substitute for specific professional advice.

 

Assegaf Hamzah & Partners
Jakarta Office
Level 36 & 37, Capital Place
Jalan Jenderal Gatot Subroto Kav 18
Jakarta 12710, Indonesia

Surabaya Office
Pakuwon Center, Superblok Tunjungan City
Lantai 11, Unit 08
Jalan Embong Malang No. 1, 3, 5,
Surabaya 60261, Indonesia
http://id.rajahtannasia.com


Contacts:

Bono Daru Adji
Senior Partner
D +62 21 2555 7800
F +62 21 2555 7899
bono.adji@ahp.co.id

Ahmad Fikri Assegaf
Senior Partner/Co-Founder
D +62 21 2555 7800
F +62 21 2555 7899
ahmad.assegaf@ahp.co.id

Chandra M Hamzah
Partner
D +62 21 2555 7800
F +62 21 2555 7899
chandra.hamzah@ahp.co.id

Eri Hertiawan
Partner
D +62 21 2555 7800
F +62 21 2555 7899
eri.hertiawan@ahp.co.id

Ibrahim Sjarief Assegaf
Managing Partner
D +62 21 2555 7800
F +62 21 2555 7899
ibrahim.assegaf@ahp.co.id


Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP


Contacts:

Hamidul Haq
Partner
D +65 62320398
hamidul.haq@rajahtann.com

Rajah & Tann Asia is a network of legal practices based in Asia.

Member firms are independently constituted and regulated in accordance with relevant local legal requirements. Services provided by a member firm are governed by the terms of engagement between the member firm and the client.

This update is solely intended to provide general information and does not provide any advice or create any relationship, whether legally binding or otherwise. Rajah & Tann Asia and its member firms do not accept, and fully disclaim, responsibility for any loss or damage which may result from accessing or relying on this update.