|
|
The Advertising Standards Authority of Singapore ("ASAS"), the self-regulatory watchdog of the advertising industry in Singapore, has published the new Guidelines on Interactive Marketing Communications & Social Media ("Guidelines"), which are aimed at setting ethical standards of conduct for digital marketing communications, with a focus on social media marketing. The Guidelines came into effect on 29 August 2016, and marketers and media owners were given until 29 September 2016 to comply. The Guidelines were released in response to the recent spate of controversies and public complaints that the ASAS had received in relation to misleading or inaccurate online marketing communications.
Click here to read our update on the key features of the Guidelines.
Recent statements by the Monetary Authority of Singapore ("MAS") have cast the spotlight on the need for banks to file a Suspicious Transaction Report ("STR") in respect of clients who participate in the Indonesia tax amnesty programme. The Indonesian Tax Amnesty Bill was passed on 1 July 2016. Under the tax amnesty contemplated under Tax Law 11/2016, participating taxpayers would have their tax liabilities (including administrative and criminal sanctions) waived upon payment of a redemption charge, which would depend on the timeframe within which declaration is made, whether the declared assets are onshore or offshore and whether the offshore assets are repatriated to Indonesia.
A close reading of the applicable statutory provision suggests that the mere fact of participation in a tax amnesty programme may not in and of itself trigger an obligation to lodge an STR under section 39 of the Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act ("CDSA").
Click here to read our update on this.
The Employment Claims Bill was passed on 16 August 2016 and it provides for a new forum for the resolution of salary-related disputes between employers and employees – the Employment Claims Tribunal ("ECT"). The ECT will be available to professionals, managers and executives earning more than $4,500 a month, who form an increasing proportion of Singapore's workforce. Currently, this group of persons do not have recourse to a specialised employment disputes forum, and have to resort to the civil courts for their claims.
Click here to read our update on the key features of the ECT, its powers and its procedures.
On 19 August 2016, Mr Ravi Menon, the Managing Director of the Monetary Authority of Singapore ("MAS") delivered a keynote address on "An Electronic Payments Society", setting out the roadmap for the future electronic payments roadmap in Singapore. This was followed by MAS issuing a consultation paper on 25 August 2016, setting out proposals for a new activity-based e-payments framework and the establishment of a National Payments Council to foster competition and collaboration in the payments industry. The consultation ends on 31 October 2016.
Click here to read our update on the proposals set out in the consultation paper.
The vast majority of challenges to arbitral awards involve allegations of breach of natural justice, but few are actually successful. JVL Agro Industries Ltd v Agritrade International Pte Ltd provides a rare example of a case where an arbitral award was successfully set aside on this ground. This landmark case is the first reported decision in which the Singapore High Court has gone on to set aside an arbitral award after remitting the matter back to the arbitral tribunal.
Click here to read our update on the case.
In recent times, financial crises like the Lehman Brothers and MF Global insolvencies have brought the issue of protection of client assets to the forefront. As a result of these events, investors are now trying to better understand the potential implications of placing their assets with intermediaries. Regulators, such as the Monetary Authority of Singapore ("MAS"), are also looking for ways to address potential risks to client assets and how to transfer or return client assets in case of default, resolution or insolvency scenarios.
MAS has undertaken a review of the regulatory requirements governing the protection of customers' moneys and assets and is proposing to enhance those relating to the safeguarding, identification and use of customer's moneys and assets, and disclosures to customers and has come up with several proposals, which are contained in the Consultation Paper on Enhancements to Regulatory Requirements on Protection of Customer's Moneys and Assets that was published on 18 July 2016. The consultation period ended on 19 August 2016.
Click here to read our update on the proposed enhancements in the Consultation Paper.
Please note that whilst the information in this Update is correct to the best of our knowledge and belief at the time of writing, it is only
intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be treated as a substitute for specific professional advice.
|
|
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP
9 Straits View
Marina One West Tower
#06-07
Singapore 18937
Republic of Singapore
http://sg.rajahtannasia.com
Contacts: Francis Xavier, SC, PBMPartnerD +65 62320551francis.xavier@rajahtann.comChia Kim HuatPartnerD +65 62320464kim.huat.chia@rajahtann.comAndrew CL OngPartnerD (65) 62320259andrew.c.ong@rajahtann.comHoward CheamPartnerD +65 62320685howard.cheam@rajahtann.com| Rajah & Tann Asia is a network of legal practices based in Asia. |
Member firms are independently constituted and regulated in accordance with relevant local legal requirements. Services provided by a member firm are governed by the terms of engagement between the member firm and the client. |
This update is solely intended to provide general information and does not provide any advice or create any relationship, whether legally binding or otherwise. Rajah & Tann Asia and its member firms do not accept, and fully disclaim, responsibility for any loss or damage which may result from accessing or relying on this update. |
|
|
